lutocracy

Feb. 12th, 2011 09:04 am
kip_w: (hands)
[personal profile] kip_w
.
At the last minute, I bought a ticket to see Paul O'Dette play at a church downtown. Though he's on the faculty at Eastman, he plays four times a year in Paris, and he plays here once every four years.

He seems to be popular, though, and filled most of the sanctuary, including a three-sided balcony section above. It's a lovely room, with a white pipe organ, some pipes of which resemble background characters in a Disney cartoon. When he started playing, the light tone of his instrument (a modern recreation of an antique) also filled the room as those of us with coughs struggled to keep our layrnxes quiet. His tuning up was more melodious than the playing of, well, I won't name names.

He presented three or four anonymous pieces, then a set of Dowland compositions, including one Dowland wrote upon a galiard of Bacheler. Bacheler was the compositional star of the night. O'Dette had been able to locate a previously unknown stash of Bacheler's works, most of them unheard for centuries. A pre-recital talk from the director of the Pegasus early music society, which had sponsored the presentation, filled me in on a lot of the details.

After the interval (during which I ran out to my car to get my monocular, to compensate for being in the back row), he played a set of Bacheler's fancies, galiards, jiggs, and such. These were a bit more intricate than the Dowland. Where Dowland would ornament with scale passages, Bacheler went for larger intervals and different figures, which one would expect to be more difficult for the performer.

You couldn't tell it from O'Dette's quiet demeanor, though. All challenges seemed equal in his deft fingers. There may have been some sub-vocal sounds coming from him — I couldn't be sure, back where I was — but the tone was musical throughout.

I could contrast it with a violin recital I attended the night before, where the intonation was a little off, pizzicato passages seemed to stick to the strings and cut off the sound, and harmonics that should have soared broke and fell to the ground.

As I left for the reception, I saw that the CDs had sold out entirely, making me glad I'd bought one on the way in. I chose the all-Bacheler disk, and it was on my iPod before I went to bed.

(I wrote a longer review earlier, but this one leaves out a lot of irrelevant stuff that I often seem unable to omit. Edited slightly at 10:30 am.)
.

Date: 2011-02-12 03:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalimac.livejournal.com
Bacheler must be a fairly recent rediscovery. Unless he's under an alternate spelling I can't find, he's not in the 1958/71 Baker's which is my at-hand musical biographical reference source. From what I know of O'Dette, this sounds like just what would attract him.

Date: 2011-02-12 04:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dd-b.livejournal.com
Martin Long published a critical study of his music in 1969, but I can't find any earlier references on the web. The Wikipedia article is surprisingly thin. Long is also the editor on the 1972 "selected works" from Oxford University Press.

Date: 2011-02-15 05:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kip-w.livejournal.com
He's not in my Grove's (fifth edition) either. The first O'Dette CD I found is still my favorite, where he plays the original versions of all the Ancient Airs and Dances that Respighi set. I love to hear them as they were written, and oddly enough, my opinion of Respighi seems to have gone up because of it.

Date: 2011-02-15 05:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kip-w.livejournal.com
I didn't know there were enough works known to select in 1972. I was thinking he had been unknown except for one or two items, but apparently I heard wrong.

Date: 2011-02-15 05:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dd-b.livejournal.com
Sometimes it takes a while for things to get around, after publication. The bibliography kind of reads to me as if Long was busily rediscovering him in the 1969-72 timeframe, and one of those publications was from an Australian university press, so people not paying quite close attention wouldn't notice it for a while over here.

Date: 2011-02-16 10:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalimac.livejournal.com
You have a Grove 5? Cool. I've seen those for sale used from time to time. I gave some thought to buying Grove 6 when the paperback came out, just before Grove 7's release, but then I thought, where would I put it? So now I go to the library and use Grove 7. I keep two ex-lib editions of Baker's at home for reference purposes, since they're much smaller.

December 2016

S M T W T F S
     12 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 1213 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21222324
252627 28 29 30 31

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 22nd, 2025 05:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios