the comment meme
Jan. 4th, 2006 11:00 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
.
I've been seeing the meme about how many comments different users have put on my LJ. It lays it all out in graphic form. I went and deciphered the cryptic instructions and got the results and pasted them here, and you know what? They were too bleeding depressing. I've made over 300 more comments in my own LJ than the next person in line. Some of my best friends turn out to have only found me worthy of comment once or twice in over a year of posting here. The evidence indicates I am of interest to very few, and not very much of that. I'm not so sure any more that this is the best use of my time.
I must think about this.
.
I've been seeing the meme about how many comments different users have put on my LJ. It lays it all out in graphic form. I went and deciphered the cryptic instructions and got the results and pasted them here, and you know what? They were too bleeding depressing. I've made over 300 more comments in my own LJ than the next person in line. Some of my best friends turn out to have only found me worthy of comment once or twice in over a year of posting here. The evidence indicates I am of interest to very few, and not very much of that. I'm not so sure any more that this is the best use of my time.
I must think about this.
.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 04:15 pm (UTC)And the reason why you have made 300 more comments is very simple:
1. entry
2. Comment by Mr A
2a Your response to Mr A.
3. Comment by Mr B.
3a Your response to Mr. B. - You've made twice as many comments as Mr a or Mr B. :p
I, for one, very much enjoy your journal and read it as much as I can.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 04:19 pm (UTC)Also, if you tend to reply to comments, it seems only natural that you'd have far more comments than anyone else.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 04:19 pm (UTC)The comment meme! Fuck the comment meme!!!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 11:22 pm (UTC)Not only that, but I wrote those other comments under a phony name!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 05:21 pm (UTC)I've been reading, too!
Date: 2006-01-04 05:34 pm (UTC)http://www.folkstreams.net/
Mary
Re: I've been reading, too!
Date: 2006-01-04 11:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 05:51 pm (UTC)Actually they need a counter for the number of times your lj is viewed (maybe they already have that) and possibly they need a little button that people can click that says, I read this, I enjoyed it but I have no comments. I probably get fewer comments than you do but there are other reasons I do it, including it's a tad therapeutic (it could be more therapeutic but then I would surely get myself in trouble.) and sometimes it is a good place to go back and see, oh yeah, I did that on such and such date. I need to add more tags though. Also I actually talk more on-line and via emails than I do in person.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 11:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-06 03:58 pm (UTC)Richard made me this one:
no subject
Date: 2006-01-06 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-06 04:32 pm (UTC)I kind of like the larger physical size, because I can barely read some of the icons people have made with clever sayings on them. And some I can't read at all!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-06 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 09:52 pm (UTC)(Seriously, that's one problem with Livejournal, to my mind, combining aspects of a personal diary and a public forum. Users in general either want to bare forth intensely personal feelings or events without comment or criticism, or feel slighted when they receive no comments. It's insidious, and I've fallen prey to it myself, though I haven't updated in over a year and not quite sure whether or not to bother now that I have time. Also, you need to post more pictures of Sarah. Those always elicit at least a token "Awwww.")
no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 11:14 pm (UTC)More pictures. I can do that.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 11:21 pm (UTC)And I learned something. If you have a comment in progress and you click on "reply to this" under someone else's name (other than the one you're originally replying to), the box moves to the new person's name, with all the stuff still inside it. That seems neat, but useless!
Anyway, thanks everybody for your kindness and patience. I'll get back to regular posting. The good advice above (**** the comment meme!) was echoed by my kind, patient spouse, so I know it's good advice. I feel like the richest man in Beford Falls. Wait, that was Potter! That means I feel like a scurvy little spider... can I do that over again?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 04:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 11:48 pm (UTC)I nearly never post links to other people's journals, but when I do, they're to yours. If I'm not pointing others to you, I'm following links. Jean Shepherd! Wax cylinders! Smithsonian music! Honestly, there must be more, but those in particular captivated me for hours.
Plus, that excellent Christmas tree.
Neither of us would do that meme, but if we did, it's certain that we'd be our own top commenters. We like the chattiness, and it's OK that you do, too.
K.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 12:25 am (UTC)If you go back to ditto, mail me a copy. And let me know if you need fillos.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 02:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 05:07 pm (UTC)One of these bullies had a name that rhymes with Jelly Beer. A teacher at my school, seeing what was happening, gave me an excellent bit of advice. "Call him Smelly Queer," she said. He backed right off!
Me too! Me too!
Date: 2006-01-05 02:47 am (UTC)If you go here and sign up and then look at your hits I think you'll be very pleasantly surprised.
It spikes with hits from all over the world right after you post (this is because of the LJ image aggregaters) after a few minutes though it settles down. I don't have a paid account, it just amuses me to see (or guess) who's reading my LJ.
Re: Me too! Me too!
Date: 2006-01-06 04:11 pm (UTC)Re: Me too! Me too!
Date: 2006-01-06 11:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 10:24 pm (UTC)